This next ad is another perfect example of an attack ad directed towards Hillary's past in politics but it is also an uplifitng candidate-positive message about Donald Trump. The ad blames Hillary's 30 years in politics directly for taxes being raised, terrorism increasing and jobs vanishing from our citizens. Although some of this may be true; Hillary Clinton would only have helped the situation moving foward towards what the ad says. She is not solely responsible for any of those things happening like the video implies. The second half of the ad talks about "Real change" from Trump and how a vote for Hillary is a vote for more of the same we've had in the past. On the other hand a vote for Trump is a vote to "Make America Great Again" and to turn Washington upside-down.
Wednesday, April 5, 2017
Advertising Strategy
This next ad is another perfect example of an attack ad directed towards Hillary's past in politics but it is also an uplifitng candidate-positive message about Donald Trump. The ad blames Hillary's 30 years in politics directly for taxes being raised, terrorism increasing and jobs vanishing from our citizens. Although some of this may be true; Hillary Clinton would only have helped the situation moving foward towards what the ad says. She is not solely responsible for any of those things happening like the video implies. The second half of the ad talks about "Real change" from Trump and how a vote for Hillary is a vote for more of the same we've had in the past. On the other hand a vote for Trump is a vote to "Make America Great Again" and to turn Washington upside-down.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I completely agree with your take on how negative ads are not as effective anymore. To me I can't help but say to myself consider the source of course Trump is going to bash Hillary and vice versa. It is only natural to want to show your opponent in a bad light to help your own cause so personally I don't take negative ads for there word.
ReplyDeleteI think the first ad does effectively show how Clinton is changing her views from 2005 to now, but that happens. I don't see it necessarily as a bad thing, but influences do change opinions especially with how times have changed since then. It's to no surprise that Trump would attack Clinton is a lot of his ads by the fact that it is what he enjoys to do. These were good ads that Ive never even seen before!
ReplyDeleteAfter reading other blogs and seeing other ideas i like yours a lot about how negative ads arent as effective as they used to be. Its getting old with the lashing back and forth of candidates or going out of their way to make the other side look worse than their own.
ReplyDelete